
Geoffrey M. Smith
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming
XRF SOURCING OF ADDITIONAL ARTIFACTS FROM LAST SUPPER CAVE, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NORTHWEST NEVADA
Source provenance studies of lithic artifacts using X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometry are a common component of archaeological research in North America’s Great Basin, where lithic resources once figured prominently in prehistoric economies. Simply put, XRF analysis identifies trace element frequencies in lithic raw materials (i.e., toolstone) of volcanic origin (e.g., obsidian) and assigns those materials to geologic sources. Researchers use these data to consider the distances and directions that toolstone was transported. In turn, this information can be used to infer prehistoric foraging territories (e.g., Jones et al. 2003), mobility strategies and/or exchange networks (e.g., Eerkens et al. 2008), and toolstone reduction strategies (e.g., Beck et al. 2002). This proposal seeks support to employ such as approach to study Pre-Archaic obsidian artifacts from Last Supper Cave, a well known archaeological site in northwest Nevada.
Research Background: Last Supper Cave (LSC) overlooks Hell Creek in the rugged High Rock Country of northwest Nevada. The cave was tested in 1968 and excavated in 1973-74 (Layton and Davis 1978); however, materials from the site are only now beginning to be analyzed. These materials include extensive lithic and faunal assemblages, perishable artifacts, and macrobotanical remains (Grayson 1988; Layton and Davis 1978). Radiocarbon dates on cultural features indicate that humans visited LSC throughout the Holocene beginning as early as ca. 9000 14C B.P. (Layton and Davis 1978). The fact that LSC contains a rich record of Pre-Archaic occupations in a stratified and well-preserved context makes the site a rarity in the Great Basin where the region’s early-period archaeological record is dominated by open-air lithic scatters (Beck and Jones 1997; Jones et al. 2003).
Recently, 35 stemmed points from LSC were submitted to the Northwest Research Obsidian Studies Laboratory for XRF analysis (Smith 2008). The results indicate that the cave’s Pre-Archaic occupants procured obsidian from sources in northwest Nevada, northeastern California, and southern Oregon. These results mirror those obtained for other Pre-Archaic assemblages in northwest Nevada including the Parman Localities (Smith 2007) and sites in the Black Rock Desert (Amick 1997) and neighboring areas (McGuire 2002; Smith 2005). Like other Pre-Archaic assemblages in northwest Nevada, none of the stemmed points from LSC are made on obsidian originating south of the Black Rock Desert. This trend provides support for earlier assertions (see Smith 2005) that the foraging territories implied by toolstone types in Pre-Archaic assemblages from northwest Nevada are more like those observed in the northern Great Basin (e.g., Oetting 1993) than those observed in the central and eastern Great Basin (e.g., Jones et al. 2003) in that they generally lack the substantial artifact transport distances (up to 250 km) observed in assemblages from the latter areas.
Because stemmed projectile points were often "curated" by their users (Beck and Jones 1997), XRF results for such tools likely provide maximum estimates of Pre-Archaic foraging ranges and/or exchange networks. Recent studies (e.g., Eerkens et al. 2007) have illustrated that finished tools like stemmed points can exhibit very different source profiles than cores and unmodified flakes. Tools and small (i.e., "retouch") flakes are often made from exotic toolstone while cores and flakes are predominantly made from local toolstone. Such studies highlight the need to include additional artifact types together with projectile points in lithic sourcing projects to better understand prehistoric lithic raw material procurement, use, and discard.
Materials and Methods: This proposal seeks support for the XRF analysis of additional artifacts from the basal strata of LSC. Previous research (e.g., Smith 2008) has demonstrated that early visitors to the cave used obsidian from northwest Nevada, northeastern California, and southern Oregon to manufacture stemmed projectile points. While these data are informative, studies of other artifact types (e.g., unifaces, debitage, cores) will provide a complimentary picture of Pre-Archaic lithic procurement. The lab grant will be used to source one particular class of artifacts - unmodified flakes - from LSC. At $35 per artifact, the grant will enable 28 flakes to be sourced. These artifacts will be selected based on two criteria: (1) they must have been recovered from the "control block", a series of excavation units at LSC that Layton and Davis (1978) felt possessed good stratigraphic integrity; and (2) they must have been recovered from the basal strata. These measures will ensure that the selected flakes were deposited coevally with the LSC stemmed points.
Submitting unmodified flakes from LSC for XRF analysis is the first step in a multi-phase effort to better understand how Pre-Archaic groups procured, used, and discarded toolstone. The first phase consists of sourcing cores and debitage from various Pre-Archaic assemblages. This effort will supplement extant data collected from the analysis of projectile points and other commonly-sourced formal tool types. The second phase will involve examining the ratios of local:non-local toolstone and debitage:non-local tools at Pre-Archaic sites in order to provide an estimate of site occupation span. Although this approach cannot provide estimates of "real time" occupation (i.e., days or weeks), it does allow researchers to rank the occupation spans of different sites relative to one another – in other words, it can be used to estimate if Site A was occupied longer than Site B (Surovell 2003). As such, it will contribute the resolution of the ongoing debate over to how Pre-Archaic groups used different parts of the landscape (e.g., uplands and valley bottoms). This work will be conducted between now and Spring 2010 as part of my dissertation work at the University of Wyoming Anthropology Department.
References Cited
Amick, D. S. 1997. Geochemical Source Analysis of Obsidian Paleoindian Points from the Black Rock Desert, Nevada. Current Research in the Pleistocene 14:97-99.
Beck, C. and G. T. Jones. 1997. The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Archaeology of the Great Basin. Journal of World Prehistory 11(2):161-236
Beck, C., A. K. Taylor, G. T. Jones, C. M. Fadem, C. R. Cook, and S. A. Millward. 2002. Rocks are Heavy: Transport Costs and Paleoarchaic Quarry Behavior in the Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21:481-507.
Eerkens, J. W., J. R. Ferguson, M. D. Glascock, C. E. Skinner, and S. A. Waechter. 2007. Reduction Strategies and Geochemical Characterization of Lithic Assemblages: A Comparison of Three Case Studies from Western North America. American Antiquity 72:585-597.
Eerkens, J. W., A. M. Spurling, and M. A. Gras. 2008. Measuring Prehistoric Mobility Strategies Based on Obsidian Geochemical and Technological Signatures in the Owens Valley, California. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:668-680.
Grayson, D. K. 1988. Danger Cave, Last Supper Cave, and Hanging Rock Shelter: The Faunas. Anthropological Papers Vol. 66, Pt. 1. American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Jones, G. T., C. Beck, E. E. Jones, and R. E. Hughes. 2003. Lithic Source Use and Paleoarchaic Foraging Territories in the Great Basin. American Antiquity 68:5-38.
Layton, T. N. and J. O. Davis. 1978. Last Supper Cave: Early Post-Pleistocene Cultural History and Paleoecology in the High Rock Country of the Northwestern Great Basin. MS in possession of the authors.
McGuire, K. R. 2002. Obsidian Production in Northeastern California and the Northwestern Great Basin: Implications for Land Use. In Boundary Lands: Archaeological Investigations along the California-Great Basin Interface, edited by K. R. McGuire, pp. 85-103. Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers 24, Carson City.
Oetting, A. C. 1993. The Archaeology of Buffalo Flat: Cultural Resources Investigations for the Conus OTH-B Buffalo Flat Radar Transmitter Site, Christmas Lake Valley, Oregon. Report submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Washington.
Smith, G. M. 2005. The Paleoarchaic Occupation of Moonshine Spring South and Moonshadow Spring, Pershing County, Nevada: Implications for Early-Period Mobility in the Great Basin. Nevada Archaeologist 20/21:57-70.
Smith, G. M. 2007. Pre-Archaic Mobility and Technological Activities at the Parman Localities, Humboldt County, Nevada. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic?: Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by K. E. Graf and D. N. Schmitt, pp. 139-155. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Smith, G. M. 2008. Results from the XRF Analysis Of Pre-Archaic Projectile Points From Last Supper Cave, Northwest Nevada. Current Research in the Pleistocene 25, in press.
Surovell, T. A. 2003. The Behavioral Ecology of Folsom Lithic Technology. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.