
Jennifer Keeling
Master's Candidate
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University
ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE CHALK BASIN, OWYHEE RIVER REGION, SOUTHEASTERN OREGON
Project Background: Chalk Basin is located in high-desert country on the middle section of the Owyhee River. Numerous sites have been recorded in close proximity to Chalk Basin, but very few have been the focus of intensive excavations by archaeologists. Some of the sites that have been investigated include, Birch Creek (Cole 2001; Andrefsky et al. 2003; Centola 2004; Wallace 2004), Dirty Shame Rockshelter (Hanes 1988), Skull Creek Dunes (Wegener 1998), Indian Grade Spring (Jenkins and Connolly 1990), Lost Dune (Lyons et al. 2001), and Antelope Creek Overhang (Plager et al. 2003). The authors of these reports have provided important information about trade networks, migration patterns, dwelling structures, period of occupation, dietary and nutritional information, and locations for raw material procurement.
Research Goals: My thesis project is an ideal candidate to add valuable information to the region because it can easily build upon information that has already been published. As such, my scope of research is focused upon writing a site report for Chalk Basin focusing on three main goals: 1) determine when the site was occupied; 2) propose potential migration patterns and/or trade networks of the former inhabitants; and 3) infer the types of activities that occurred at the site. Achieving these goals will be beneficial in placing Chalk Basin into a regional context of the Owyhee River locale. For example, knowing where the obsidian found at Chalk Basin was obtained can answer if past residents were visiting the same obsidian resources as groups from Birch Creek (Cole 2001; Wallace 2004) and Lost Dune (Lyons et al. 2001). Also, knowing the site function and time of occupation will provide information that can be compared to Hanes’ (1988) ‘Regional Patterns’ to determine if residents of Chalk Basin would fit into his proposed model.
Methods: The result of the 2004 field investigations has provided me with the data to address the aforementioned goals of my thesis project. The first goal is to determine when the site was occupied. Based on the projectile point typology (Elko Cornered and Rose Spring points), the site has a 6400-year general window of occupation that could be further reduced to a smaller and more precise range of dates. Some bone fragments recovered 40 cm below datum in Test Unit 1 may provide enough collagen to obtain an absolute date through AMS dating methods (Bennett et al. 1978; Fagan 1997). These bone samples will be submitted this summer for dating and the results will be included in my Master’s thesis.
The second and third goals of my thesis project, i.e. lithic sourcing and technological organization, structure the framework for the lithic analysis. One prominent feature of the site is the possible exploitation of a white chert that occurs naturally at the site and appears to have been used there for tool manufacture. My analysis focuses on the possibility of local procurement of this white chert but also addresses other raw materials utilized by past cultural groups, specifically the use of obsidian. Two of the projectile points and numerous debitage pieces recovered from the site are made from obsidian. The occurrence of obsidian at the site, coupled with the fact that there are no known local outcrops, sparks another important question to be addressed: where is the obsidian outcrop from which past cultural groups procured this resource? Answering this question can provide information about how the residents of Chalk Basin moved around the landscape.
With the technology of obsidian sourcing (Jones et. al 1996; Amick 1999), artifacts manufactured from obsidian can be matched to their original outcrop based on their distinct chemical signature. My major problem with this technology is expense, approximately $35 per sample. While the BLM has provided support for the fieldwork and some lab analysis, I am lacking funds to test for obsidian sources (XRF analysis) on approximately twenty-five samples. A Northwest Obsidian Studies Laboratory grant would provide support for this part of my thesis project, helping me to demonstrate possible trade networks and/or human migration within the Owyhee locale.
Finally, the lithic analysis is geared towards trying to decipher activities occurring at the site by using a technological approach. Following Andrefsky’s (1998) model of lithic debitage analysis, I am trying to determine what types of artifacts were being processed and/or used at the site through attribute analysis of flakes. For example: were they reducing the material into just cores and/or preforms? Or were they reducing materials from the site into finished tools? Another possible alternative could be that no manufacturing was occurring at the site and residents were bringing in finished tools and performing maintenance activities. As mentioned earlier, knowing the activities occurring at the site will determine if residents of Chalk Basin fit into Hanes’ model of Mid and Late Archaic occupations.
Summary: Answering these questions would provide a baseline study for subsequent researchers in this area to help understand other sites along the Owyhee River. Funding from the Northwest Obsidian Studies Laboratory would provide support for obsidian sourcing. Ideally, I would like to submit twenty-five samples for XRF analysis of obsidian artifacts. This amount would provide adequate data for me to integrate the results with other nearby sites that have relied on the Northwest Obsidian Studies Laboratory for chemical analysis, specifically those from Birch Creek (Cole 2001; Wallace 2004) and Lost Dune (Lyons et al. 2001).

Fieldwork at Chalk Basin, southeastern Oregon.
References Cited
Amick, D.S. 1999. Using Lithic Artifacts to Explain Past Behavior. In Models for the Millennium: Great Basin Anthropology Today. Edited by Charlotte Beck. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Andrefsky, W., Jr. 1998. Lithics: A Macroscopic Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Andrefsky, W, Jr., L.Centola, J. Cowan, and E. Wallace. 2003. An Introduction to the Birch Creek Site (35ML181): Six Seasons of WSU Archaeological Field Study 1998-2002. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Contributions in Cultural Resource Management, No. 69. Washington State University, Pullman.
Centola, L.A. 2004. Deconstructing Lithic Technology: A Study From the Birch Creek Site (35ML181), Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Master’s thesis on file at Washington State University.
Cole, C. R. 2001. Raw Material Sources and the Prehistoric Chipped-Stone Assemblage of The Birch Creek Site (35ML181), Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Master’s thesis on file at Washington State University.
Fagan, B. M. 1997. Archaeology: A Brief Introduction, Sixth edition. Longman, New York.
Hanes, R.C. 1988. Lithic Assemblage of Dirty Shame Rockshelter: Changing Traditions in the Northern Intermontane. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 40, Eugene.
Huntley, J.L. 1986. A Survey Overview of Several Archaeological Sites on the Owyhee River between Home and Leslie Gulch. Unpublished report submitted to the Bureau of Land Management, Vale, Oregon.
Jenkins, D. L. and T.J. Connolly. 1990. Archaeology of Indian Grade Spring: A Special Function Site on Stinkingwater Mountain, Harney County Oregon. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 42.
Jones, G.T., D.G. Bailey, and C. Beck. 1997. Source Provenance of Andesite Artefacts Using Non-Destructive XRF Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:929-943.
Lyons, W.H., S.P. Thomas, and C.E. Skinner. 2001. Changing Obsidian Sources at the Lost Dune and McCoy Creek Sites, Blitzen Valley, Southeast Oregon. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 23(2):273-296.
Plager, S., M.G. Plew, and C. A. Willson. 2003. The Archaeology of Antelope Creek Overhang, Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Report submitted to the Bureau of Land Management. Vale, Oregon.
Wallace, E. 2004. Obsidian Projectile Points and Human Mobility Around the Birch Creek Site (35ML181), Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Master’s thesis on file at Washington State University.
Wegener, R.M. 1998. Late Holocene Stone Technology and Seed and Faunal Remains from Skull Creek Dunes Locality-6, Catlow Valley, Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Master’s thesis on file at Washington State University.