|
As part of the PGT-PG&E Pipeline Expansion Project (PEP) that was carried out in the early 1990's, over 9,500 obsidian artifacts from 133 Oregon, California, and Idaho archaeological sites were selected for obsidian characterization studies (see table below). The trace element composition of 9,059 of these items was determined by X-ray (XRF) fluorescence spectrometry and the resultant elemental abundances were used to identify the geochemical sources of the samples (Skinner 1995a). All Oregon and Idaho artifacts were analyzed by Richard E. Hughes (Geochemical Research) who, along with BioSystems Analysis, also characterized the California specimens. A much smaller number of California artifacts were visually characterized prior to preparation for obsidian hydration measurements. After geologic source identification, the majority of the obsidian artifacts were then examined for the presence of obsidian hydration rims (Skinner 1995b). Oregon samples were represented by 6,644 items from 83 archaeological sites in the eight counties intersected by the Pipeline. Sample sizes ranged by county from four artifacts in Umatilla County to 2,602 items in Deschutes County. Forty eight sites from eight California counties were also selected for characterization studies and a total of 2,864 items were submitted for source identification. Two items of obsidian debitage from 10-BY-444, the only two Idaho artifacts of adequate size for XRF analysis, were also included in the trace element studies. This combined corpus of 9,510 specimens still constitutes, to our knowledge, the largest sample of characterized obsidian artifacts associated with any single archaeological project in the world to date.
The sample of artifacts selected for obsidian studies included most of the Oregon and many of the California obsidian tools that were suitable for XRF analysis (greater than 10 mm minimum dimension). The selection of debitage samples at individual sites was made on the basis of site specific strategies typically relating to obsidian procurement or chronologic objectives. Due to the previously recognized problematic nature of obsidian studies at north central Oregon sites and the relatively small number of obsidian artifacts recovered during testing and data recovery activities, a 100 percent sample of obsidian debitage suitable for XRF analysis was selected from many of these sites. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the completion of the obsidian research in early 1994, a significant amount of new information has become available concerning the Oregon sources the were situated within the procurement zone of the pipeline. Northwest Research has maintained a very active geochemical source survey program in Oregon - many new sources have been identified and many known sources, particularly those located in the Mt. Hood, Malheur, and Ochoco national forests and the High Lava Plains, have now been adequately studied. Because of this, we now feel that the time is right for a reevalulation of the original Oregon trace element data that resulted from the PEP obsidian studies. Although most of the original source assignments were valid, new source information should permit us to identify the geologic sources of many of the artifacts that were assigned to unknown sources. In addition, recent extensive trace element investigations of obsidian sources at Glass Buttes and the Ochoco and Malheur national forests should allow us to clear up many provisional source assignments that resulted from our incomplete knowledge of these areas prior to the time of initial project completion. These provisional assignments were largely associated with the Whitewater Ridge, Little Bear Creek, and Juniper Spring sources. We now know that the Juniper Spring sources originated from the nearby Glass Buttes Source Complex and that the Whitewater Ridge and Little Bear Creek sources belong to a single highly variable geochemical source group. After several years of searching, however, we have still failed to locate the so-called Unknown X source that probably lies somewhere on the lower western flanks of Newberry Volcano (now the Newberry National Volcanic Monument). There is no timeline for the completion of the reanalysis of the 6,595 Oregon obsidian artifact data - we'll simply work on them as time allows. For an update on our progress, check back here from time to time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Back to the Research Home Page
Back to the Obsidian Lab Home Page